Nice to see innovating trying to solve the common threaded comment design flaw (not a big fan of the forced vertical repositioning on stack un-/grouping as even with animations it slightly breaks your visual fixation)!
Though for the width issue there is a simpler solution for most of the cases (except for very deep trees) - just make the margin smaller.
In the product video there are two relatively big margins - left of the comment box and left of text within the box. But this is pure waste, you don't need so much whitespace to signal text hierarchy.
This is great. Thanks for creating it! Matches how I read comments, and fixes my only gripe with HN: I'm forever missing the touch target of the little [-] to collapse a thread once I have read it. Yes there is a next button too, but I prefer to collapse so I don't see what I've already read when scrolling around.
I found a bug on first launch. Every item was duplicated in the list. A refresh fixed it.
Anyway, thanks for building this, it's very nicely done and useful.
I can’t recall it crashing on me (not that I doubt it is for you), but for other issues the author has been extremely responsive. IIRC you can report issues directly from the app.
Nicely done - thanks for making it. Not sure if I’ll ever get used to swipe actions between boards though… other than that I appreciate its simplicity. The haptics slider is a nice touch too
I had already downloaded a previous version of this app, so I was happy to see that it was already on my phone. With Octal having an issue recently, it's nice to try out this alternative.
We're very fortunate that so many hackers are intrinsically motivated to make excellent (even free) apps for this purpose, since we like hanging out here!
For Android users: Download the excellent, and well maintained Harmonic app and enable "Auto-collapse top level comments" to achieve the same BFS effect.
Thanks! As of now I don't have any plans for Android. It's a native iOS app written in Swift, so that would require building a new app from the ground up.
Opened it up, first thing I do is set it to dark because every other HN app runs on dark — immediately prompts me to upgrade and pay. Sorry, but making money by not being annoying is such an old-school way to try and make a buck. Totally understand it can't be free, but then let people pay for things that make your app stand out — not the ability to "let the dark mode toggle stay put", I mean...
The app's premium unlock appears to be a $6 one-time purchase. Given that it's not a consequential life decision, the way a subscription can sometimes be, I would rather normalize paying for software that is well-made and lovingly maintained instead of having everything be free but it falls into disrepair after some big Apple update because it's too hard to justify working on it anymore.
I have a harder time with software that I have to sign up for a "trial" of a $20 monthly subscription before I can really experience what it's like to use it. With this app, you can see exactly how it works during the daytime at least, and what settings you'd be able to use once you pay, and no trial hanging over your head.
The app already does a good job of standing out with its main premise and I doubt there are enough other stand out features to add for the niche. The problem really lies in the monetization focusing on the table stakes features up front instead of the stand out features after a while.
Should be free first of all, HN is free after all and with it's old tech it is still working well and is also friction free. I've seen plenty of show HN:HN and most don't have traction because the original is just too good. It's probably one reason why it withstood the test of time and why we still have a community here.
I think it's less "too good" and more "$0 but been around 18 years so why bother with any alternative for >=$0 which has been around for 2 months. Also, why do I trust you again?". I.e. "not bad enough".
Or it’s that every platform like this that does a major upgrade to the UI is awful. They are almost always driven by people looking to increase revenue at the expense of the user experience. The users hate it and leave in mass. Having seen this pattern time and time again, I don’t know why sites keep doing it, other than then obvious “investor pressure.”
There seems to be an inverse relationship between the spend on development and user experience.