35 points by jryio 3 hours ago | 2 comments
rishabhjajoriya 5 minutes ago
Thinking about LLM teams as distributed systems actually makes a lot of sense. Coordination, latency, and failure modes start to look very similar to traditional distributed architectures.
measurablefunc 2 hours ago
Next up, LLMs as actors & processes in π-calculus.
keeganpoppen 0 minutes ago
i cant wait for the world to catch up to process, session, et al. calculii. the closest i’ve seen is all this “choreo” stuff that is floating around nowadays, which is pretty neat in itself.
robot-wrangler 31 minutes ago
> Next up, LLMs as actors & processes in π-calculus.

You jest, but agents are of course already useful and fairly formal primitives. Distinct from actors, agents can have things like goals/strategies. There's a whole body of research on multi-agent systems that already exists and is even implemented in some model-checkers. It's surprising how little interest that creates in most LLM / AI / ML enthusiasts, who don't seem that motivated to use the prior art to propose / study / implement topologies and interaction protocols for the new wave of "agentic".

measurablefunc 24 minutes ago
That's all nice & well but which protocol & topology will deliver the most dollars from investors?
timcobb 1 hour ago
Is it web scale?
measurablefunc 1 hour ago
Abstractly? 100%. Realistically? Depends on how many trillions we can get from investors.