45 points by speckx 3 hours ago | 7 comments
ajb 1 hour ago
There is a fundamental minimum amount of energy needed to desalinate: you can't take less energy to do it,than you could gain back (from osmotic pressure) if you allowed the desalinated water to expand a cylinder containing the residual brine. This is large. This paper is a thermal method, so it doesn't have an electricity input, but to justify their efficiency claim, they should really compare against what you could do by using the same surface area for solar panels, driving a conventional setup. My (limited) understanding is that conventional reverse osmosis is not far from the theoretical optimum, energy-wise, the main difficulties being operational (the membranes need declogging). And of course RO is more expensive than rain.

This paper is interesting, however, in directly producing crystalline salt, which is lower volume than brine and easier to dispose of, maybe even valuable.

51 minutes ago
fhdkweig 1 hour ago
This appears to be the same New Rochester article as 4 days ago with 20 comments.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349507

b0rbb 15 minutes ago
Awesome, love seeing stuff out of Rochester - RIT or UofR or any of the nearby schools.

Totally underrated area for academic pursuits.

0x59 13 minutes ago
Agree! Shout out to the Laboratory for Laser Energetics
kaonwarb 1 hour ago
This reads like hyperbole:

> The brine byproduct wreaks havoc on sea life when it’s deposited back into the ocean by raising the salt level and lowering oxygen in the water.

Managing return of concentrated brine should be entirely tractable in the literal ocean.

rconti 59 minutes ago
Sure, but typically desalination plants are located in a single physical place, so a discharge pipe dumping brine 24x7 is bad for all of the things around it, as the local concentration is extremely high.
joshred 54 minutes ago
Seems like you could run a long perforated tube to diminish that effect.
dieselgate 44 minutes ago
I wonder what the linear diffusion gradient would look like for that. Like the perforated garden hoses or whatever for soaking soil. Aquatic organisms grow so quick though very curious on the constraints for something like this.
dylan604 49 minutes ago
I liked the idea of loading it up on a ship that sails out releasing as it goes out and back. Make it solar powered or even go old school with literal sails.
sgc 36 minutes ago
I thought they tend to pipe far out and discharge as far below the surface as possible, since there is a lot of surface life and it is less damaging this way.

Ships (with long submerged pipes) would be prone to weather events and generally less reliable than an installed pipe. Perforation would be prone to clogging from build up so a nonstarter I would expect. Adding flex tubing and a relocation robot would be a maintenance headache as well. Not sure there is an easy optimization.

scythe 17 minutes ago
If you want to be really clever about it, maybe the ship is powered by the brine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmotic_power

01100011 51 minutes ago
And it doesn't even need to be a rigid pipe. A flexible pipe made out of, say, waterproof fabric, could be cheaply made to extend miles while remaining open due to the pressure of the water pumped into it.
dylan604 49 minutes ago
Things left underwater tend to collect things on it which would make this much less porous over time.
wolfi1 57 minutes ago
depends of course, how easy does the brine dissolve, how long does it take that it is so diluted that it can't do any harm, without that information it's not easy to tell
dylan604 51 minutes ago
These are often built near shallower parts along the coast where changes are more pronounced.
boxed 18 minutes ago
I mean.. we really want to permanently desalinate the ocean somewhat too so putting the brine back seems kinda stupid. Put it on land, let it dry, sell some as table salt and dump the rest into abandoned mines.
mkl 37 minutes ago
> without waste

...except for the huge piles of salt.

If the salt was not waste, surely people would already be extracting it from the brine and the existing methods would also be "without waste".

eimrine 32 minutes ago
Persian Gulf has 20% more salt in water because of the humans which are throwing the oversalinated waste back into the sea. Dehidrated salt may be a big deal for some areas because of no waste into input.
Jblx2 16 minutes ago
>Persian Gulf has 20% more salt in water because of the humans

I would like to read more about this from an authoritative source.

doublerabbit 43 minutes ago
What about removing oil from water, have we conquered that yet?
phtrivier 16 minutes ago
"in mice". No, wait, that auto-reply is for cancer breakthrough.

Let me check, is that a wonderful battery ? Nope.. A promising fusion ? Neither...

Ok, so this must be the fourth kind of pseudo-wonder discovery that will maybe make it out of the lab in 20 years, if the research team managed to get scraps of funding while VC pick the next way to waste pensioners money.

Anyway, whenever they have desalinated enough water to get each researcher a pint, the round is on me.